Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 39 KAN 334 - Schultz v. Hine

Schultz v. Hine’s Empirical Analysis

1888

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
April 1942
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently April 1942

4 state decisions

201888189019001910192019301940decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Three days before the time of appearance are required; and we think this provision does not contemplate that three full days shall elapse between the day of service and the day of appearance, or that any exception shall be made from the statutory rule of computing time.” (p. 337.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.