39 Kan. App. 2d 180 - State v. Huntley’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

16 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “[P]robably the most important is I'm not sure even if you and the State of Kansas paid for the money to hire whomever you were going to hire to look at these tapes, that this Court was going to allow that testimony to come in. I think that you can, by cross-examination, question the people as to can kids be led, and are they subject to that? I think jurors normally know those things just because they've had kids and therapy kids. And so, some of those things are not expert testimony type issues, they are common sense.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 59 Kan. App. 2d 418 - State v. Brown

2. “holding that the proper protocols and techniques used to interview child victim witnesses is a matter not within the knowledge and understanding of the average juror. . . . This caselaw seems to be in step with an emerging trend to recognize and permit expert testimony on the impact of suggestive interviewing techniques on child witnesses.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Ballou

3. “even though [the defense attorney] had suggested to [him that the defense] might be available to go back to trial next month, this Court couldn't put [the defense] on a jury trial docket until March at the next time.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 59 Kan. App. 2d 418 - State v. Brown