State v. Andrews’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

4 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““Meaningful notice may include a signed acknowledgment form, an informational handbook or orientation session, a monitoring notice posted by the outbound telephone, or a recorded warning that is heard by the inmate through the telephone receiver, prior to his or her making the outbound telephone call. See [United States v.] Footman, 215 F.3d [145,] 154 [1st Cir. 2000] (signed form, notices on phones and prerecorded messages played when phone calls placed); [United States v.] Amen, 831 F.2d [373,] 379 [2d Cir. 1987] (federal prison regulations, orientation lecture, informational handbook and signs posted); [United States v.] Willoughby, 860 F.2d [15,] 20 [2d Cir. 1988] (orientation lecture, signs posted, signed form); [United States v.] Workman, 80 F.3d [688,] 693 [2d Cir. 1996] (posted signs, orientation handbook and signed form); [United States v.] Hammond, 286 F.3d [189,] 191-92 [4th Cir. 2002] (handbook, consent form, orientation lesson, and notices posted near phones); [United States v.] Horr, 963 F.2d [1124,] 1126 [8th Cir. 1992] (orientation handbook and lesson, consent form, posted signs); [United States v.] Van Foyck, 77 F.3d [285,] 292 [9th Cir. 1996] (posted signs, consent form and prison manual); People v. Kelley, [ 103 Cal. App. 4th 853, 858-59 ,] 127 Cal. Rptr. 2d 203, 206-07 (Ct. App. 2002) (citing federal cases for proposition that meaningful notice would include a monitoring notice posted by a phone ‘or a recorded warning that is heard by the inmate’) (emphasi”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Gilliland