39 Kan. App. 2d 220 - Hodges v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Szoboszlay v. Glessner · Black v. Don Schmid Motor, Inc. · International Petroleum Services, Inc. v. S & N Well Service, Inc. · Dieker v. Case Corp. · 6 Kan. App. 2d 100 - Schuh v. Educational Reading Services of Kansas, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““An air conditioner is not a major component of a car that is 10 years old with over 135,000 miles on it, and does not fall within the implied warranty of merchantability. We find no implied warranty of merchantability, considering the age of the car, the high mileage, and the fact that the Hodges provided no proof that the air conditioner did not work when they purchased the vehicle.” Hodges, 39 Kan. App. 2d at 225 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hodges v. Johnson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.