39 Kan. App. 2d 568 - State v. Moore’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
July 2019
most recently cited
12 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Terry v. Ohio · Berkemer v. McCarty · State v. Gunby · State v. Nunn
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““K.S.A. 22-2402(1) also permits officers to question a driver during the course of a traffic stop. That section provides: “Without making an arrest, a law enforcement officer may stop any person in a public place whom such officer reasonably suspects is committing, has committed or is about to commit a crime and may demand of the name, address of such suspect and an explanation of such suspect’s actions.’ ” State v. Moore, 39 Kan. App. 2d 568, 581 , 181 P.3d 1258 , rev. denied 286 Kan. 1184 (2008).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Whether the length of detention is reasonable is a question of law over which this court has unlimited review.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.