Cameron v. Carelli’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
47 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 47 later decisions — most recently March 2019 · most notably Green v. Town of Brookline (2001), O'Leary-Alison v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance (2001)
47 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Dwyer v. Globe Newspaper Co. · Lolos v. Berlin · McCone v. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co. · Alholm v. Town of Wareham · Shawmut Community Bank, N.A. v. Zagami
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Due to the insufficiency of the record, we are unable to review the evidence presented at trial to determine whether the plaintiff met [his] burden of proof. The plaintiff failed to include all portions of the trial transcript that are crucial to our review of the evidence in the record appendix, as required by Mass.R.A.P. 18 [a], as amended, [425] Mass. [1602] [1997]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“An appellant's obligation to include those parts of the trial transcript and copies of motions 'which are essential for review of the issues raised on appeal .... is a fundamental and long-standing rule of appellate civil practice.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“We decline to address the [defendant's] cursory and unsubstantiated argument, as it does not rise to the level of acceptable appellate argument.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.