39 Md. App. 257 - McKemy v. Baltimore County’s Empirical Analysis
1978
Citation profile
18 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently March 2018
18 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Service Realty Corporation v. Planning & Zoning Board of Appeals · Matter of Monument Garage Corp. v. Levy · Kahl v. Consolidated Gas, Electric Light & Power Co. · New London v. Leskiewicz · Powers v. Building Inspector of Barnstable
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) to what extent does the current use of these lots reflect the nature and purpose of the original non-conforming use; (2) is the current use merely a different manner of utilizing the original non-conforming use or does it constitute a use different in character, nature, and kind; (3) does the current use have a substantially different effect upon the neighborhood; (4) is the current use a “drastic enlargement or extension” of the original non-conforming use.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.