39 Md. App. 365 - Robeson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1978
Citation profile
2 district · 24 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently June 2011 · most notably Robeson v. State (1979), 79 Md. App. 152 - Parham v. State (1989)
2 district · 24 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Doyle v. Ohio · Michigan v. Tucker · United States v. Hale · Brown v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Q. [by assistant state’s attorney] Did you move out of your house? A. [by appellant] Yes, I did. Q. You were hiding from the police, weren’t you? A. Not really hiding. Q. Well, you knew a warrant was out for your arrest; didn’t you? A. Yes, I did. Q. You were hiding? A. I was. Q. Had you your suitcases there? A. Yes, I did. Q. You had all your clothes there? A. Yes, I did. Q. In a separate room; didn’t you? A. From hers. Q. In her house? A. Yes, I did. Q. There was a bed in that room, wasn’t there? A. Yes, it was. Q. You were hiding from the police? A. I was staying there temporarily until, you know, I could hear the, you know, the results of this, you know. Because I knew I didn’t do it, and I wasn’t the only one that they said did it at the time, because the police come into the restaurant and said they had a warrant for someone else for it. And then I heard they had a warrant for me for a period. And I didn’t want to get arrested for no homicide I know I didn’t do it. So, I did, you know, leave my mother’s house. Q. Until January 3rd, until you were arrested; right? A. Yes. Q. You didn’t tell the police what happened. Did you go down to the police and tell them you had nothing to do — MR. SUTLEY [defense attorney]: I would object, your Honor. THE COURT: I think that is a perfectly proper question. I will take the answer. Q. [by assistant state’s attorney] Did you ever tell the police what happened? A. No, I didn’t. I told them what I knew after, you know, after — THE COUR”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Robeson v. State“cross-examination [of a defendant] concerning 'pre-arrest silence' with respect to exculpatory testimony offered by a defendant for the first time at the trial on the merits.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.