Keahey v. Dunagan’s Empirical Analysis
1978
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Baltimore Transit Co. v. State Rx Rel. Schriefer · Victory Sparkler & Specialty Co. v. Francks · Solari v. Atlas-Universal Service, Inc. · 6 Cal. App. 3d 707 - Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Morse · Shook v. Jacuzzi
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Maryland must, and therefore does, recognize the exclusivity of the California workmen’s compensation remedy, where, as here, that remedy was in fact available and utilized by the injured employee.” 4 Id. at 400. The bar to employer-employee suits is grounded in the philosophy underlying workmen’s compensation as the statutory exception to common law negligence. As stated in Woodner, supra:”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.