Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 39 Md. App. 578 - Tipton v. State

39 Md. App. 578 - Tipton v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
states following
January 2015
most recently cited

22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently January 2015

22 state decisions

14019781980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Dorsey v. State · Ratcliff v. Bruce · 28 Md. App. 640 - Evans v. State · State v. Evans · Hall v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Although relevant, evidence may be excluded if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, or misleading the jury, or by considerations of undue delay, waste of time, or needless presentation of cumulative evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““... the balancing of the intangibles — probative value against probable dangers — is essentially a discretionary matter to be determined by the trial judge and in the absence of an abuse of that discretion it will not be disturbed on review.” (Citations omitted.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “it is not necessary that the court give a requested instruction if the matter is fairly covered in the instruction actually given and the jury was not misled on the subject.” It might be argued that the use of the words”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.