¶1The issue in this case relates to the payment of a certain sum upon a mortgage. The testimony is at variance, and in the court below it was found to preponderate in favor of payment. We see no sufficient ground for refusing to accept this conclusion. The decree must be affirmed with costs.
39 Mich. 210
Killam v. Axford
Decided June 21, 1878
Michigan Supreme Court · decided 1878-06-21
<p> Affirmance of decree for weight of evidence. </p> <p>A decree is affirmed where no sufficient reason is seen to disturb the conclusion of the court below upon the preponderance of testimony.</p>
Decided 1878-06-21