Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 39 MINN 69 - State v. Sackett

State v. Sackett’s Empirical Analysis

1888

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
10
states following
March 2010
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2010

1 federal appellate · 18 state decisions — followed in 10 states

4018881890190019101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Cancemi v. . the People · Hill v. People · Morehead v. Grisham · State v. Borowsky

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ The wise and beneficent provisions found in the constitution and statutes, designed for the welfare and protection of the accused, may be waived, in matters of form and substance, when jurisdiction has been acquired, and within such limits as the trial court, exercising a sound discretion in behalf of those before it, may permit. The defendants, having formally waived a juror, and stipulated to try their case with 11, cannot now claim that there was a fatal irregularity in their trial.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Patton v. United States
  2. “[t]he bill of rights (article 1 of our constitution) contains three sections, the fourth, sixth, and seventh, which are designed for the protection of the citizen accused of crime. . . . Each is an independent but absolute guaranty to those needing protection.. . .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. State v. Lessley

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.