Klapper v. Hanover Insurance’s Empirical Analysis
1963
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently June 1984
2 federal appellate · 10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on A. T. Morris & Co. v. Lumber Mutual Casualty Insurance
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““* * * Possession or control of real property is indicated by an occupation exclusive of the control of anyone else * * *. <<* * # “Here we have a contractor who was hired to clean windows, and nothing more. Certainly, it cannot be said that the contractor had care, custody and control over them, when they were admittedly a part of the real property. The holding of this court might well be different were the windows detached from the building and given over to the contractor for cleaning, but such was not the action before the court/ ’”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“property used by or in the care, custody or control of the insured or property as to which the insured for any purpose is exercising physical control.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“is indicated by an occupation exclusive of the control of anyone else.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.