Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 39 MISC2D 345 - People v. Sams

People v. Sams’s Empirical Analysis

1963

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
July 1974
most recently cited

Relationships

Relies on Mapp v. Ohio · People v. Sadness · Matter of Hogan v. Court of General Sessions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It would introduce confusion in the administration of justice if defenses or objections which might have been made and reviewed on appeal could be reserved as grounds for collateral attack upon the judgment of conviction years after it was rendered.” People v. Howard, 12 N.Y.2d 65, 68 , 236 N. Y.S.2d 39, 43, 187 N.E.2d 113, 116 , (1962).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.