Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 39 MISC2D 876 - People v. Kenyon

People v. Kenyon’s Empirical Analysis

1963

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
December 1980
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently December 1980

2 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

20196319701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on People v. Prosser

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “To sustain sentence as a multiple offender it must be shown that the offense in question occurred after the conviction for the crime used to support multiple offender status.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.