Garrett v. Lowe’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently July 2016
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 10 U.S.C. § 818 · 10 U.S.C. § 852 · 10 U.S.C. § 859 · 10 U.S.C. § 867 · 10 U.S.C. § 876 · 10 U.S.C. § 880 · 10 U.S.C. § 918 · 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Relies on Quantum Chemical Corp. v. Pratt · Universal Cooperatives, Inc. v. FCX, Inc. · Dodson v. Zelez · Bateman v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We are unaware that there are time limits for petitioning for a writ of error coram nobis.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.