United States v. Pete’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 10 U.S.C. § 866 · 10 U.S.C. § 881 · 10 U.S.C. § 889 · 10 U.S.C. § 894 · 10 U.S.C. § 976
Relies on Whalen v. United States · Penson v. Ohio · United States v. Grostefon · Mabey v. Official Committee of Equity Security Holders · United States v. Matias
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(3) to organize or attempt to organize, or participate in, any strike, picketing, march demonstration, or other similar form of concerted action involving members of the armed forces that is directed against the Government of the United States and that is intended to induce any civilian officer or employee, or any member of the armed forces, to— (C) make any change with respect to the terms or conditions of service in the armed forces of individual members of the armed forces; ...”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.