Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 39 Mo. App. 393 - State v. Searcy

39 Mo. App. 393 - State v. Searcy’s Empirical Analysis

1890

Citation profile

41
cited by 41 later decisions
2
states following
December 1914
most recently cited

41 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 41 later decisions — most recently December 1914 · most notably State v. O'Brien (1907), State v. Dugan (1892)

41 state decisions

150189019001910decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Town of South Ottawa v. Perkins · Gardner v. The Collector · Post v. Supervisors · Johnson v. Beazley · State v. Kilgore

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““~We hold, that it is sufficient in such a case, for the indictment to allege that the act of the Legislature, approved April 5, 1887, known as the Local Option Law has been duly adopted and was in force as the law of the state within the territory within which the offense is laid, at the date of the alleged offense, without reciting in detail the manner in which it was so adopted,, which is merely the pleading of evidence. So much of the indictment in the present case as went beyond this may, therefore, be rejected as surplusage; and the fact that it erroneously states the date of the act of the Legislature as April 5, 1888, instead of April 5, 1887, is of no importance, since there is but one act by that title and the clerical error is one which corrects itself.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.