Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 39 N.C. App. 373 - State v. Liddell

39 N.C. App. 373 - State v. Liddell’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
May 2016
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Greene · 33 N.C. App. 42 - State v. Robinette · State v. . Jenkins · 35 N.C. App. 64 - State v. Holley · State v. Killian

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is not always necessary that the indictment allege the actual owner. It is generally stated as the rule that no fatal variance exists when the indictment names an owner of the stolen property and the evidence discloses that that person, though not the owner, was in lawful possession of the property at the time of the offense.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “We note that the purposes of requiring an indictment to allege the ownership of the stolen property have been served here. The requirements are intended to (1) inform defendant of the ele ments of the alleged crime, (2) enable him to determine whether the allegations constitute an indictable offense, (3) enable him to prepare for trial, and (4) enable him to plead the verdict in bar of subsequent prosecution for the same offense. We do not see how these purposes could have been better served had the indictments alleged ownership in [the vending company].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.