Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

39 N.C. App. 687

State v. Hamilton

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 6, 1979

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · decided 1979-02-06

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently October 1987

1 state decisions

Relies on State v. Bryant · 31 N.C. App. 556 - State v. Small

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1979-02-06

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

WEBB, Judge.

¶1The defendant’s only assignment of error pertains to the charge. He argues the court did not properly define assault on a female. In its charge concerning assault on a female, the court said that one of the things the State must prove is “that the defendant assaulted Patricia McClendon, that he at least laid his hands on her without her consent.” Assuming this was error, we hold it did not harm the defendant. In this case all the evidence including the evidence of the defendant showed there was a completed act of intercourse. The issue was whether this intercourse was with the consent of the prosecuting witness. The charge of assault on a female should not have been submitted to the jury. State v. Bryant, 280 N.C. 551, 187 S.E. 2d 111, cert. denied, 409 *688U.S. 995 (1972). It was error favorable to the defendant and we hold he was not prejudiced by this charge. State v. Small, 31 N.C. App. 556, 230 S.E. 2d 425 (1976).

¶2No error.

Judges Parker and Arnold concur.
/39/ncapp/687 · .json · Public domain