State v. MacRi’s Empirical Analysis
1963
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 2 district · 72 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 77 later decisions — most recently December 2017 · most notably State v. Novembrino (1987), State v. Doyle (1964)
3 federal appellate · 2 district · 72 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Carroll v. United States · Mapp v. Ohio · Jones v. United States · Boyd v. United States · Draper v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 77 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[b]efore the judge is in a position to make his determination for issuance, he must properly be made aware of the underlying facts or circumstances which would warrant a prudent man in believing that the law was being violated.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“Eyes may not be closed to the infringement of a constitutional right because the officer was well-meaning and the transgression is deemed slight”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.