People v. Taylor’s Empirical Analysis
1976
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently September 2000
4 federal appellate · 9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“in Federal prosecutions the `word district as used in the Sixth Amendment no doubt referred to the judicial districts established' by Congress in the Federal Judiciary Act ... but the fact remains that the Legislature of this State and most States generally ... has designated the place of trial without reference to the judicial district created by [the Federal Judiciary Act].... [D]efendant's rights in this regard have been governed by ... the common-law right to be tried by a jury from the county where the crime was committed unless the Legislature provides otherwise.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“trial of an indictment in a special narcotics part [should] for all purposes be deemed to be a trial in the county in which the indictment was filed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the common-law right to be tried by a jury from the county where the crime was committed unless the Legislature provides otherwise.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.