Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

39 N.Y.2d 775

People v. Graham

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 29, 1976

New York Court of Appeals · decided 1976-04-29

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1976-04-29

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently April 1997

1 state decisions

10197619801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Memorandum. Order affirmed on the majority memorandum at the Appellate Division with respect to the issues there covered. Concerning the admissibility of the testimony of the robbery victim and his daughter, it has been settled within reasonable perimeters that the testimony of a live witness is not necessarily excludible because the identity of the witness had been ascertained by a breach of the rules governing search and seizure (see, generally, People v Mendez, 28 NY2d 94 [ Gibson, J.], and the authorities cited, cert den 404 US 911).

¶2Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke concur in memorandum.

¶3Order affirmed.

/39/ny2d/775 · .json · Public domain