39 Ohio App. 144 - Ruby v. Wolf’s Empirical Analysis
1931
Citation profile
53 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 54 later decisions — most recently July 2024 · most notably 26 Ohio App. 3d 116 - Dentsply International, Inc. v. Kostas (1985), Black v. Industrial Commission (1957)
53 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 54 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“is restricted to placing upon the record evidence of judicial action which has been actually taken”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“The function of nunc pro tunc is not to change, modify, or correct erroneous judgments, but merely to have the record speak the truth.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Jones“`the records of a court or other tribunal may be made to speak the truth.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.