39 Ohio App. 2d 97 - Adomeit v. Baltimore’s Empirical Analysis
1974
Citation profile
421 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 421 later decisions — most recently March 2026 · most notably GTE Automatic Electric, Inc. v. ARC Industries, Inc. (1976), Caruso-Ciresi, Inc. v. Lohman (1983)
421 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 32 Ohio App. 2d 319 - Matson v. Marks · 30 Ohio App. 2d 187 - Antonopoulos v. Eisner · 34 Ohio App. 2d 209 - Brenner v. Shore · 32 Ohio App. 2d 329 - Cautela Bros. Cement Contractors v. McFadden · 17 Ohio App. 2d 31 - Berea Bus Lines Co. v. Seminatore
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 421 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“To prevail on a motion brought under Civ.R. 60(B), the movant must demonstrate that: (1) the party has a meritorious defense or claim to present if relief is granted; (2) the party is entitled to relief under one of the grounds stated in Civ.R. 60(B)(1) through (5); and (3) the motion is made within a reasonable time, and, where the grounds of relief are Civ.R. 60(B)(1), (2) or (3), not more than one year after the judgment, order or proceeding was entered or taken.”
28 later decisions quote this exact passage“If the material submitted by the movant in support of a motion for relief from judgment under Civil Rule 60(B) contains no operative facts or meager and limited facts and conclusions of law, it will not be an abuse of discretion for the trial court to overrule the motion and refuse to grant a hearing.”
17 later decisions quote this exact passage“If the movant files a motion for relief from judgment and it contains allegations of operative facts which would warrant relief under Civil Rule 60(B), the trial court should grant a hearing to take evidence and verify these facts before it rules on the motion.”
12 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.