Crouser v. Crouser’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
26 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently February 2026 · most notably Morris v. Morris (Slip Opinion) (2016), 133 Ohio App. 3d 288 - Biscardi v. Biscardi (1999)
26 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Wolfe v. Wolfe · Knapp v. Knapp · State v. Slatter · McClain v. McClain · 45 Ohio App. 2d 57 - Popovic v. Popovic
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“between the competing principles of finality of judgments and perfect results by vesting the courts -4- Butler CA2023-01-001 with broad, but not unlimited, authority to set aside judgments.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“a procedural mechanism that should be reserved for relief when parties have no substantive remedy available to them for the review of judgments,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[t]o permit a collateral attack on such a judgment by using Civ.R. 60(B) would be to encourage neverending litigation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.