Curtis & Gartside Co. v. Pigg’s Empirical Analysis
1913
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 26 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently June 2010 · most notably 49 Cal. 4th 35 - Martinez v. Combs (2010), Fields v. Volkswagen of America, Inc. (1976)
1 federal appellate · 26 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on International Harvester Co. of America v. Cameron · Whitaker v. Crowder State Bank · Chicago R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Woodworth
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““This statute and the decisions cited very clearly support the contention- that in certain cases a judgment may be rendered on the pleadings although a verdict has already been rendered against the moving party. Tn such cases, however, it must clearly appear upon the face of the pleadings that the movant is entitled to the. judgment asked for.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hanna v. Gregg
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.