McComb v. Watt’s Empirical Analysis
1913
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
November 1934
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Cameron, Superintendent v. Parker · Rullman v. Hulse · Bash v. Howald · Weis v. Levy · Rice v. Nolan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It has been held that this proceeding by motion to discharge an attachment is a proper practice (Carnahan v. Gustine, 2 Okla. 399 , 37 Pac. 594 ), and that the issue thus presented is triable to the court, and that the parties are not entitled to a jury (Cassady v. Morris. 19 Okla. 203 , 91 Pac. 888 ; Bash v. Howald, 27 Okla. 462 , 112 Pac. 1125 ).””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.