Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 39 Okla. 500 - Porter v. Wilson

Porter v. Wilson’s Empirical Analysis

1913

Citation profile

35
cited by 35 later decisions
2
states following
October 1969
most recently cited

34 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently October 1969 · most notably Werbe v. Holt (1950), Wilson Motor Co. v. Dunn (1928)

34 state decisions

100191319201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Suydam v. Williamson · Mullen v. Thaxton · McCann v. McCann · Ziska v. Ziska · Edmisson v. Drumm-Flato Commission Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “•'Where the trial is before the court, it is charged with the duty of determining the facts; while where the trial is before the jury, the facts are for its determination; it being the province of the court to declare the law. We must not, however, overlook the very important fact that the court did not render its judgment alone upon the demurrer to the evidence, but, after a consideration of the proof submitted by plaintiff, made its findings of fact, thereby necessarily weighing the plaintiff’s testimony for the purpose of determining the rights of the respective parties to a recovery.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““It is obvious from the record that the court passed upon the entire case. Where it appears, as in this case, that the court weighed the evidence, and determined plaintiff’s right to recover after a consideration of the proofs offered, it would be too subtle a refinement to say that the court should have overruled the demurrer, and thereupon, on the same evidence, have found for the defendant ; otherwise, a reversal must follow.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.