State v. McDaniel’s Empirical Analysis
1901
Citation profile
57 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 62 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 2003 · most notably Elkins v. United States (1960), Wolf v. People of the State of Colorado (1949)
57 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Sparf v. United States · People v. Northey · State v. Steeves · State v. Saunders · State v. Baker
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 62 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Where the evidence offered logically forms a link in a chain of circumstances tending to connect the defendant with the commission of the crime charged in the indictment or is so connected therewith as to form one entire transaction it is admissible, although it may tend to prove other offenses.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Willson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.