Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 39 P.3d 522 - Stoneking v. State

Stoneking v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
May 2025
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on California Department of Corrections v. Morales · Nolan v. Sea Airmotive, Inc. · Allen v. State · Ware v. City of Anchorage · Stoneking v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a statute is not illegally retrospective merely because it upsets expectations or operates to the disadvantage of individual defendants.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “alter the definition of criminal conduct or increase the penalty,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.