Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 39 PACOMMW 260 - McMahon v. Commonwealth

McMahon v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
1
states following
April 1998
most recently cited

28 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently April 1998 · most notably Com., Dept. of Transp. v. O'CONNELL (1989), 68 Pa. Commw. 541 - Waigand v. Commonwealth (1982)

28 state decisions

230197819801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Commonwealth v. Miles · 4 Pa. Commw. 119 - Department of Transportation v. Cannon · 9 Pa. Commw. 460 - Bureau of Traffic Safety v. Drugotch · Commonwealth v. Heresko · Boyle v. Commonwealth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “For the proper suspension of an operator’s license pursuant to Section 624.1(a) of the Code the arresting officer must initially have ‘reasonable grounds’ to believe that the person has been driving under the influence of intoxicating liquor. Commonwealth v. Miles, 8 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 544 , 304 A.2d 704 (1973). In addition the Commonwealth must show (1) that the defendant was placed under arrest (2) that he was charged with the operation of a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor (3) that he was requested to submit to a breathalyzer test and (4) that he refused to comply with the test.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.