Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 39 So. 3d 1234 - Caraballo v. State

39 So. 3d 1234 - Caraballo v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
1
states following
April 2019
most recently cited

26 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Rakas v. Illinois · Ring v. Arizona · Dusky v. United States · 491 So. 2d 1129 - State v. DiGuilio

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A person who claims the protection of the [Fourth] Amendment [must have] a legitimate expectation of privacy in the invaded place. Although warrantless searches and seizures are generally prohibited by the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution and article I, section 12, of the Florida Constitution, police may conduct, a search without a warrant if consent is given or if the individual has abandoned his or her interest in the property in question.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““As a result of the court’s obligation to ensure that the material stages of a prosecution not proceed against a criminal defendant while the defendant is mentally incompetent, any defendant may be subjected to mandatory competency evaluation and, consequently, subjected to the risk of saying something or responding in a manner that is detrimental to or incriminates the defendant.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “(d) Limited Use of Competency Evidence (1) The information contained in any motion by the defendant for determination of competency to proceed or in any report of experts filed under this rule insofar as the report relates solely to the issues of competency to proceed and commitment, and any information elicited during a hearing on competency to proceed or commitment held pursuant to this rule, shall be used only in determining the mental competency to proceed or the commitment or other treatment of the defendant. (2) The defendant waives this provision by using the report, or portions thereof, in any proceeding for any other purpose, in which case disclosure and use of the report, or any portion thereof, shall be governed by applicable rules of evidence and rules of criminal procedure. If a part of the report is used by the defendant, the state may request the production of any other portion of that report that, in fairness, ought to be considered.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.