Posner v. Posner’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 382 So. 2d 1197 - Canakaris v. Canakaris · 801 So. 2d 101 - Florida Dept. of Transp. v. Juliano · Brandt v. Brandt · 560 So. 2d 403 - Garcia v. Garcia · 701 So. 2d 663 - Ordini v. Ordini
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We further require that the trial court refashion the repayment of this amount so that the husband is not foreclosed from a more expeditious repayment of the amount of the equalization payment. This could be accomplished by various methods. Those may include, but are not limited to: • providing a shorter payout period, including a lump sum repayment after a few years; repayment from the sale of various of the wife’s assets, particularly the marital home; or allowing the amount to be reduced to judgment so that the husband is permitted to collect it from the wife’s assets. Except for the option of simply reducing the equalizing payment to judgment,-. the court should retain specific jurisdiction over the future repayment provisions to account for changed circumstances. The court cannot, however, retain jurisdiction to change the amount of the original equalization payment, which is a set property division between the parties.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.