39 So. 3d 464 - Koch v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
January 2019
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 893 So. 2d 683 - Boland v. State · 575 So. 2d 779 - State v. Mahoy · 916 So. 2d 969 - Blandin v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“1. (Defendant) was the driver of a vehicle involved in a crash or accident. 2. The crash or accident resulted only in damage to a vehicle or other property. 3. The [vehicle] [other property] was [driven] [attended] by [a person] [ (name of person) ]. 4. (Defendant) failed to stop at the scene of the crash or, accident or as close to the crash or accident as possible and.remain there until [he] [she] had given “identifying information” to the [driver or oc cupant of the damaged vehicle] [person attending the damaged vehicle or property] [and to any police officer at the scene of the crash or accident or who is investigating the crash or accident. 5. A duly authorized law enforcement officer ordered (defendant) to stop. 6. (Defendant), knowing [he] [she] had been ordered to stop by a law enforcement officer, [willfully refused or failed to stop [his] [her] vehicle in compliance with the order to stop] [and after having stopped in knowing compliance with the order to stop, willfully fled in a vehicle in an attempt to elude the law enforcement officer]. 7. As a result of (defendant) fleeing or eluding, [he] she] caused [serious bodily injury to] [the death of] (name of victim).”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“1. (Defendant) was operating a vehicle upon a street or highway in Florida. 2. (Defendant), knowing [he] [she] had been directed to stop by a duly authorized law enforcement officer, willfully fled in a vehicle in an attempt to elude a law enforcement officer. 3. The law enforcement officer was in an authorized law enforcement patrol vehicle with agency insignia and other jurisdictional markings prominently displayed on the vehicle and with siren and lights activated.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.