State v. Buitrago’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
August 2014
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Arizona v. Youngblood · Houlihan, Lokey, Howard & Zukin, Inc. v. Circle K Corp. · 760 So. 2d 903 - Way v. State · 808 So. 2d 1237 - King v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“To establish a Brady violation, generally, “[t]he defendant must allege specific facts that, if accepted as true, establish a prima facie case that (1) the State possessed evidence favorable to the accused because it was either exculpatory or impeaching; (2) the State willfully or inadvertently suppressed the evidence; and (3) the defendant was prejudiced.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Gilson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.