Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

39 So. 3d 585

State v. Blackman

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided July 2, 2010

Supreme Court of Louisiana · decided 2010-07-02

Relies on 29 So. 3d 499 - State v. Weathersby

Decided 2010-07-02

¶1In re State of Louisiana; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. A, No. 493-991.

¶2Writ granted. A defendant has no right to an unredacted police report containing witnesses’ identifying information unless he demonstrates a “distinctive reason why fundamental fairness dictates discovery of the names of these witnesses.” State v. Weathersby, 09-2407 (La.3/12/10) 29 So.3d 499, 501. No such showing has been made. In light of the State’s concerns regarding witness safety, and the absence of any peculiar circumstances requiring disclosure, we find that the witness identifying information should remain confidential. The judgments of the lower courts are reversed, vacated, and set aside, and the matter is remanded to the district court for further proceedings.

/39/so3d/585 · .json · Public domain