Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 39 So. 3d 943 - Catchings v. State

39 So. 3d 943 - Catchings v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
June 2018
most recently cited

9 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · 863 So. 2d 836 - Byrom v. State · 954 So. 2d 968 - Ross v. State · 607 So. 2d 1171 - Jenkins v. State · 921 So. 2d 292 - Spicer v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The jury is presumed to have followed the directions of the trial judge.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.