Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 39 S.W.3d 52 - Russell v. State

Russell v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
January 2012
most recently cited

12 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Luleff v. State · State v. Ervin · Sanders v. State · State v. Bradley · Kilgore v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) post-conviction counsel takes no action on a movant’s behalf with respect to filing an amended motion and as such the record shows that the movant is deprived of a meaningful review of his claims; or (2) when post-conviction counsel is aware of the need to file an amended post-conviction relief motion and fails to do so in a timely manner.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.