Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 39 S.W.3d 899 - State v. Cullen

State v. Cullen’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
3
states following
May 2016
most recently cited

13 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey · Almendarez-Torres v. United States · Monge v. California · Monge v. California · State v. Hefflin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “proof of one or more prior intoxication-related convictions under § 577.023 is not an essential element of the underlying intoxication-related offense for which a defendant is charged ... Rather, the proof of such prior convictions merely serves to authorize enhanced punishment for the underlying offense charged, if the defendant is found guilty.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.