Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 39 Tenn. App. 539 - Grant v. Grant

39 Tenn. App. 539 - Grant v. Grant’s Empirical Analysis

1954

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
3
states following
April 2013
most recently cited

24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently April 2013

24 state decisions

801954196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Davenport v. Davenport · 34 Tenn. App. 352 - Marmino v. Marmino · Stubblefield v. State Ex Rel. Fjelstad · State ex rel. Parker v. Parker

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““36-825. Transfer of property when decree for husband. — In all cases of either divorce or separation, where the relief therein to be decreed by the court is decreed to the husband on his petition, the court may, upon a proper showing of fact, adjust the respective rights of the parties with regard to property jointly owned so as to preserve for such a husband that portion of such joint property as for which, he contributed and paid, and for this purpose the court is hereby empowered to divest and vest title to either real or personal property and, where appropriate, to divest out of a defendant wife any residual title to property prior thereto held by the entireties between her and the complainant. (Acts 1953, ch. 90, Sec. 1 [Williams, Sec. 8446].)””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““The general rule is that the Trial Court is vested with wide discretion in matters of divorce, alimony, and attorneys fees, custody and support of minor children, and Appellate Courts will not interfere except upon a showing of an abuse of that discretion. Marmino v. Marmino, 34 Tenn.App. 352 , 238 S.W.2d 105 .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.