Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

39 Tex. Crim. 524

47 S.W 365

Ex Parte Williams

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided October 19, 1898

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · decided 1898-10-19

Tried below, in vacation, before Hon. J. S. Straughan. Relator having been committed at an examining trial for the murder of one Austin King, on Monday, the 8th of August, 1898, sued out a writ of habeas corpus for bail, which writ was heard by Hon. J. S. Straughan in vacation, and bail refused; and from said judgment refusing bail, relator prosecutes this appeal. The appeal was dismissed because the transcript of the record was not properly certified by the trial judge.

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently February 1931

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1898-10-19

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

*529 DAVIDSOU, Judge.

¶1 Appellant was arrested charged with the murder of Austin King, and resorted to the writ of habeas corpus to secure bail. Upon the hearing of the ease in vacation he was remanded to custody, without bond; hence this appeal.

¶2 Upon an examination of the record, we find that it is not certified by the judge, as required by the statute. For this reason we can not entertain jurisdiction of this appeal. See Ex Parte Malone, 35 Texas Crim. Rep., 297. There are several other cases following the Malone Case, but we deem it unnecessary to cite them. The appeal is accordingly dismissed.

¶3 Appeal dismissed.

¶4 Hurt, Presiding Judge, absent.

¶5 After the dismissal of the appeal,, relator cured the defect in the transcript as pointed out in the above opinion by having the same properly certified by the judge who tried the case, and upon, his motion the judgment of dismissal was set aside and the cause reinstated upon the docket, and the following is the opinion upon the merits, delivered Uovember 2, 1898:

/39/texcrim/524 · .json · Public domain