Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 39 U.S. 178 - The Lessee of Henry Brewer v. Jacob Blougher

The Lessee of Henry Brewer v. Jacob Blougher’s Empirical Analysis

39 U.S. 178 · 1840

Citation profile

74
cited by 74 later decisions
18
cited 18 times by the Supreme Court
16
states following
March 2022
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 29 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 74 later decisions (18 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2022 · most notably United States v. Trans-Missouri Freight Ass'n (1897), Hooper v. People of State of California (1895)

6 federal appellate · 29 state decisions — followed in 16 states

2001840185018601870188018901900191019201930194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Stevenson's v. Sullivant

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 74 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ It is undoubtedly the duty of the court to ascertain the meaning of the legislature, from the words used in the statute, and the subject-matter to which it relates; and to restrain its operation within narrower limits than its words import, if the court are satisfied that the literal meaning of its language would extend to cases which the legislature never designed to embrace in it.””
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““The Act of 1825 (ch. 156, of Maryland), provides: ‘That the illegitimate child or children of any female, and the issue of any such illegitimate child or children, be, and they are hereby declared to be, able and capable, in law, to take and inherit both real and personal estate from their mother, or from each other, or from the descendants of each other, as the case may be, in like manner as if born in lawful wedlock.’ Then follows a proviso, which has no application to the present question.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.