Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 39 U.S. 464 - The United States v. Isaac Morris

The United States v. Isaac Morris’s Empirical Analysis

39 U.S. 464 · 1840

Citation profile

96
cited by 96 later decisions
19
cited 19 times by the Supreme Court
12
states following
October 2024
most recently cited

12 federal appellate · 24 district · 17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 96 later decisions (19 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 2024 · most notably United States v. Lanier (1997), Northern Securities Company v. United States (1904)

12 federal appellate · 24 district · 17 state decisions — followed in 12 states

2401840185018601870188018901900191019201930194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Wiltberger · United States v. Gooding · The Merino the Constitution the Louisa Barrias · The Emily and the Caroline

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 96 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In expounding a penal statute the court certainly will not extend it beyond the plain meaning of its words; for it has been long and well settled that such statutes must be construed strictly. Yet the evident intention of the legislature oueht not to be defeated by a forced and overstrict construction.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““Tlio Intention of tlie Legislature is to be collected from the words they employ. Where there is no ambiguity in the words, there is no room for construction.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. ““To be employed in anything means not only the act of doing it, but also to be engaged to do it; to be under contract or orders to do it.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.