Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 39 Va. App. 728 - Mullins v. Commonwealth

39 Va. App. 728 - Mullins v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
November 2004
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 25 Va. App. 193 - McGee v. Commonwealth · 26 Va. App. 299 - Ohree v. Commonwealth · White v. Morano

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “1. That there is no legally authorized person available to give consent [for her]; 2. That [appellant] is incapable either of making an informed decision regarding a specific treatment or course of treatment or is physically or mentally incapable of communicating such a decision; 3. That [appellant] is unlikely to become capable of making an informed decision or of communicating an informed decision with the time required for decision; and 4. That the proposed course of treatment is in the best interest of [appellant]____”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Code § 37.1-134.21(A) provides that the court may order [t]he provision, withholding or withdrawal of a specific treatment or course of treatment for a mental or physical disorder, if it finds upon clear and convincing evidence that (i) the person is either incapable of making an informed decision on his own behalf or is incapable of communicating such a decision due to a physical or mental disorder and (ii) the proposed action is in the best interest of the person.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “On appeal, we [will] consider only the issues raised.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.