Griffith v. Peter’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1367 · 28 U.S.C. § 1927 · 29 U.S.C. § 1001 (§ 2 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 621 (§ 2 of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 703 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 48 U.S.C. § 1612
Relies on Peacock v. Thomas · Angeline OSTAPOWICZ, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JOHNSON BRONZE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant · Eash v. Riggins Trucking Inc. · Fellheimer Eichen Braverman Pc v. Charter Technologies Incorporated & Pc · Republic of Philippines
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.