Euphrat v. Morrison’s Empirical Analysis
1905
Citation profile
4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently August 1933
4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Norfor v. Busby · Balfour-Guthrie Investment Co. v. Geiger
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Provisions of the statute which are not repealed are to the effect that a receiver may be appointed in all actions, where it is shown that the property, fund, or rents and profits in controversy arc in danger of being lost, removed, or materially injured in an action by a mortgagee for the foreclosure of a mortgage and the sale of the mortgaged property, when it appears that such property is in danger of being lost, removed, or materially injured and in such other cases as may be provided for by law, or when, in the discretion of the court, it may be necessary to secure ample justice to the parties.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Collins v. Gross
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.