Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 39 Wash. 2d 258 - State v. Olds

39 Wash. 2d 258 - State v. Olds’s Empirical Analysis

1951

Citation profile

34
cited by 34 later decisions
1
states following
June 2021
most recently cited

34 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently June 2021 · most notably 91 Wash. 2d 466 - State v. Foster (1979), 78 Wash. 2d 121 - State v. Golladay (1970)

34 state decisions

13019511960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “demand the nature and cause of the accusation against him,”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “” 'Wrongfully obtains' or 'exerts unauthorized control' means: " (a) To take the property or services of another; " (b) Having any property or services in one's possession, custody or control as bailee, factor, pledgee, servant, attorney, agent, employee, trustee, executor, administrator, guardian, or officer of any person, estate, association, or corporation, or as a public officer, or person authorized by agreement or competent authority to take or hold such possession, custody, or control, to secrete, withhold, or appropriate the same to his or her own use or to the use of any person other than the true owner or person entitled thereto; or "(c) Having any property or services in one's possession, custody, or control as partner, to secrete, withhold, or appropriate the same to his or her use or to the use of any person other than the true owner or person entitled thereto, where such use is unauthorized by the partnership agreement;"”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “An information shall be considered amended to conform to the evidence introduced without objection in support of the crime substantially charged therein, unless the defendant would thereby be prejudiced in a substantial right.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.