Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 39 Wash. 2d 578 - Seekamp v. Small

39 Wash. 2d 578 - Seekamp v. Small’s Empirical Analysis

1951

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
4
states following
February 2010
most recently cited

18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently February 2010

18 state decisions

601951196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Davin v. Dowling · Bosworth v. Wolfe · Soderberg v. King County · Smith v. Gruber Lumber Co. · Johnson v. Bank of Pasco

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “was nevertheless entitled to recover what he had paid on the purchase price, as money had and received by appellant, under the principle that `no one ought unjustly to enrich himself at the expense of another'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[T]he failure of [the plaintiff] to prove a cause of action in conversion does not of itself justify the granting of a new trial. The complaint contained allegations sufficient to state a cause of action for money had and received and the record is replete with evidence, admitted without objection, entitling [the plaintiff] to recover on that cause of action. . . .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “there can be no conversion of money unless it was wrongfully received by the party charged with conversion, or unless such party was under obligation to return the specific money to the party claiming it;”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.