Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 39 WASHAPP 145 - State v. George

State v. George’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
May 1999
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Johnson v. Zerbst · Barker v. Wingo · Klopfer v. State of North Carolina · Henry v. State of Mississippi · Brookhart v. Janis

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[b]eing of statutory origin, a defendant's rights ... are `merely supplementary to and a construction of the Constitution....' They do not carry the force or weight of constitutionally mandated imperatives.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[c]ounsel's power in this regard is not unlimited.... Nor may counsel effectively waive his client's rights where the record reveals that the latter was the victim of inadequate representation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.